III AdvancedWeek 9 • Lesson 24Duration: 55 min

DDM Drawdown Management

The math of not blowing up — and why it's asymmetric

Learning Objectives

•Understand the brutal asymmetry of drawdown recovery
•Learn systematic drawdown management protocols
•See how DD-triggered risk scaling works in practice
•Internalize why preventing drawdowns beats chasing returns

Explain Like I'm 5

A 50% drawdown needs a 100% gain to recover. A 10% drawdown only needs 11%. The math is brutally asymmetric — losses hurt way more than gains help. That's why any serious system needs dedicated drawdown control. Making less money is always better than risking a blowup.

Think of It This Way

Think of a race car driver. The fastest driver isn't the one who pushes hardest on every turn — it's the one who knows when to brake. Pushing too hard means crashing. Conservative in the dangerous spots, aggressive on the straightaways. Drawdown protection is your anti-lock braking system.

1The Recovery Asymmetry

This chart should make you uncomfortable. Drawdown recovery is asymmetric and gets exponentially harder. A 10% drawdown needs about 11% to recover. Fine. A 50% drawdown needs 100% — you have to double your remaining capital. A 75% drawdown needs 300%. At that point you're basically starting over. This is why risk management isn't optional. You can have the best signal in the world and still blow up with bad risk controls.

Recovery Needed vs Drawdown Size

2DD-Triggered Risk Scaling

The smart approach is a zone system that automatically reduces risk as drawdown increases. Normal zone (0–4% DD): Full risk. Maximum earning potential. This is where you spend most of your time. Caution zone (4–6% DD): Reduced risk. Slow the bleeding before it gets worse. Danger zone (6–8% DD): Minimum risk. Survival mode. Critical zone (8–10% DD): Emergency. Smallest possible positions. The design is intentional — you start at full risk and only scale down during drawdowns. Most systems start conservative and never reach full potential. This approach makes money in good times and protects capital in bad times. Once drawdown recovers, risk scales back up automatically. No manual decisions. No emotional override.

3Risk Zones Visualized

The drop isn't linear — the biggest reduction happens in the danger zone because that's where survival becomes critical. The normal zone is intentionally wide so you spend most of your time at full power. If you're constantly in reduced-risk mode, you won't earn enough to pass a challenge or grow a funded account. The system needs to run hot when conditions allow it.

Risk Allocation by Drawdown Zone

4After Drawdown, Returns Tend to Improve

This is counterintuitive but backed by data: post-drawdown periods tend to be more profitable than average. Why? Drawdowns often coincide with regime transitions. Once the new regime stabilizes, a well-designed system re-adapts. And drawdown periods cluster — once the bleeding stops, it usually stops hard. This validates the automatic recovery logic. During drawdown: reduce risk, protect capital. After drawdown: scale risk back up, capture the recovery. Some traders panic during drawdowns and quit. That's the worst time to stop, because recovery is often the most profitable phase. The system doesn't panic. That's the point.

5The Psychology Problem

The math is only half the battle. Your brain actively works against you during drawdowns. Predictable stages: 1. Denial — "it'll bounce back" → hold losers, increase risk 2. Anger — "the market is wrong" → revenge trading 3. Bargaining — "just one more trade to break even" → overtrading 4. Despair — "I should quit" → stopping during recovery The purpose of systematic drawdown management is removing yourself from this cycle. The rules are set in advance. When DD hits 4%, risk drops to 0.25%. Period. Doesn't matter how you feel about it. This is the real value of algorithmic trading — not the alpha, but the discipline. Humans are bad at managing drawdowns. Machines don't have feelings. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk." Econometrica.

Key Formulas

Drawdown

How far current equity (E_t) has fallen from its high water mark (HWM_t). A 5% DD means you're 5% below your peak.

Recovery Needed

The return needed to recover from drawdown DD. 10% DD needs 11.1% recovery. 50% DD needs 100%. The asymmetry gets worse fast.

Hands-On Code

DD-Triggered Risk Scaling

python

import numpy as np

class DrawdownRiskScaler:
    """Automatically reduce risk as drawdown increases."""
    ZONES = {
        'NORMAL':   {'range': (0.00, 0.04), 'risk': 0.0030},
        'CAUTION':  {'range': (0.04, 0.06), 'risk': 0.0025},
        'DANGER':   {'range': (0.06, 0.08), 'risk': 0.0020},
        'CRITICAL': {'range': (0.08, 0.10), 'risk': 0.0015},
    }
    
    def __init__(self, starting_balance):
        self.hwm = starting_balance
    
    def get_zone(self, balance):
        self.hwm = max(self.hwm, balance)
        dd = (self.hwm - balance) / self.hwm
        
        for zone, params in self.ZONES.items():
            low, high = params['range']
            if low <= dd < high:
                return zone, dd, params['risk']
        return 'HALT', dd, 0.0
    
    def position_size(self, balance, atr):
        zone, dd, risk_pct = self.get_zone(balance)
        size = (balance * risk_pct) / atr
        print(f"Zone: {zone} | DD: {dd:.2%} | Risk: {risk_pct:.2%}")
        return size

Simple, automatic, no discretion needed. The system detects drawdown and adjusts. This is what keeps a production system alive during bad stretches.

Knowledge Check

Q1.A 20% drawdown requires what recovery to break even?

Q2.Why start at full risk instead of starting conservative?

Assignment

Implement DD-triggered risk scaling and backtest it against fixed risk sizing. Compare total return, max drawdown, and Sharpe ratio. The adaptive version should show similar returns with meaningfully lower max drawdown.

← Previous Lesson Next Lesson →